top of page

Gaslighting in the Workplace: When It Becomes Part of Corporate Culture

Writer: Wander&Prosper
Wander&Prosper
Jul 30
3 min read

Updated: Sep 15

Disclaimer: This post is meant to inspire and share ideas for informational purposes only, based on personal experiences and opinions. It isn’t intended as legal, medical, financial, tax, safety, immigration, insurance, travel, or other professional advice. For more details, please see our Disclaimer.


Empty corporate conference room with a long table, laptop, meeting notes, documents, and office chairs overlooking a city skyline.

Gaslighting can occur in workplace relationships and can undermine trust, communication, and collaboration. Repeated gaslighting behaviors may cause someone to question their perceptions, experiences, or understanding of workplace events.

So, you ask, what does workplace gaslighting actually look like, and how can you recognize it?


How do I know if I am being gaslit?

Workplace gaslighting can involve behaviors such as dismissing concerns, shifting responsibility, contradicting previous statements,  or manipulating situations in ways that cause others to question their perceptions, experiences, or understanding of events.


In the workplace, concerning patterns might include repeatedly denying previous statements, contradicting documented information, shifting responsibility for decisions, changing expectations and later denying they changed, dismissing another person's recollection of events, or presenting conflicting versions of what happened.


What can Workplace Gaslighting Look Like?


Contradictory Statements

Consider a project where one person is responsible for gathering requirements from a customer.


That person tells the team that the necessary requirements have been gathered and that everyone understands what needs to be completed. The team proceeds based on that information.


Later, the customer says the finished work doesn't reflect what they expected.

The person responsible then denies giving those instructions or shifts responsibility to the employees who completed the work.


The employees may now find themselves defending decisions they made based on information they were originally given.


A single misunderstanding or disagreement is not necessarily gaslighting. But when denial, contradictory accounts, blame shifting, and revision of previous events become a repeated pattern, it's worth paying attention.


When Someone Takes Credit for Your Idea

Imagine that you suggest an improvement during a meeting with coworkers. A colleague dismisses the idea or says they don't support it.


Later, during another meeting with leadership present, that same colleague presents essentially the same idea enthusiastically, without acknowledging that you originally proposed it.


Taking credit for someone's work isn't automatically gaslighting. But if the person later denies that you originally presented the idea or insists that events occurred differently, that behavior may become part of a larger pattern worth documenting.


Focus on Facts, Not Motives

One of the most useful things you can do when dealing with confusing workplace interactions is focus on observable facts rather than trying to determine another person's intentions.


Instead of:

"She is trying to make me look incompetent."


Document:

"During Monday's meeting, I was instructed to complete X. On Wednesday, I was told that X had never been requested."


That distinction matters because facts, dates, written communications, project requirements, meeting notes, and specific statements provide something concrete to evaluate.


Keep a Clear Record

If you're experiencing repeated contradictory or concerning workplace interactions, consider keeping written records.


Save relevant emails and messages. Take notes during or immediately after important meetings. Document dates, decisions, responsibilities, deadlines, and changes to requirements.


When appropriate, sending a written recap after a meeting can also create clarity:

"To make sure we're aligned, here's my understanding of what we agreed to today..."


This isn't about treating every coworker as an adversary. Good documentation is simply good professional practice, particularly when responsibilities or project requirements are complex.


Set Professional Boundaries

When possible, respond to contradictory statements calmly and specifically. Rather than arguing about someone's motives, return to the facts:


"My notes from Tuesday's meeting show that we agreed to..."


"The email sent on May 4 lists these requirements..."


"I understood the deadline to be Friday. Can we confirm the current deadline?"


Keeping the conversation focused on specific information can help prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a debate about personalities or intentions.


Protect Your Professional Well-Being

Repeatedly dealing with contradictory information, shifting expectations, denied conversations, or blame can make the workplace incredibly frustrating.


You don't have to determine whether someone officially qualifies as a "gaslighter" to recognize that a pattern of behavior is interfering with your ability to work effectively.


Focus on what you can establish: what was said, what was written, what was agreed upon, what changed, and what happened afterward.


Keep good records. Communicate clearly. Establish appropriate professional boundaries.


And perhaps most importantly, don't let someone else's version of events prevent you from checking the facts for yourself.


Wander&Prosper

bottom of page